At many points in a hospital’s functioning, workflow touches the outcome. The problem facing much of healthcare though is that the established workflow for alerting and messaging physicians is broken. What are ways for improving scheduling doctors? What are the potential impacts from improvement?
Scheduling doctors is essential for a hospital’s efficient functioning. It’s how doctors know who’s on first and what’s on second, to paraphrase Abbott and Costello. Yet many hospitals we see have their schedules committed to a whiteboard or a few sheets of paper. When so much technology exists to facilitate scheduling, committing important information to a white board or a piece of paper leaves the hospital open to many unintended errors.
These problems are highlighted by the facts laid out in one study which noted:
Efficient communications and collaboration between physicians, specialists, nurses and care team members is critical to enhance patient safety, and support the coordination and delivery of patient care across health settings. … Inefficient communications during critical clinical workflows costs the average U.S. hospital approximately $1.75 million annually.
Inefficiency has a price tag and a big one at that.
Further impacting efficient workflow is the use of pager technology. Doctors are at the mercy of what is becoming an increasingly unreliable technology. These issues include:
The troubles with pagers are further encapsulated by the malpractice suits that result from poor communication. According to one source
In 23,000 medical malpractice claims and suits [brought in 2015] in which patients suffered some degree of harm, three out of every 10 cases include at least one specific breakdown in communication. … errors often occur because information is unrecorded, misdirected, never received, never retrieved, or ignored.
Pagers are unfortunately susceptible to this very sort of miscommunication and communication breakdown. For the very reason that they are not persistent and do not provide a way for further communication, pagers can bring an unnecessary degree of harm into healthcare.
Efficient communications and collaborations between physicians and nursing teams are critical to improved patient outcomes. This improvement is based on understanding the imperfect workflow – described above – and recognizing the attributes of an improved scenario.
This improved workflow should:
These steps highlight the necessary components of a critical alerting platform that is required to improve doctor to doctor and doctor to hospital communication. By improving communication, hospitals will improve workflow and reduce mistakes. Hospitals and clinics can attempt to develop the technology which underlies this sort of improved workflow or they can try the OnPage solution which encompasses all these components.
Statistics show that 70 percent of treatment delays and sentinel events in a hospital are caused by a communications breakdown. To me, that seems like a sufficient reason for hospital staff and doctors to find a way to improve workflow and the ways they communicate. Otherwise, we risk inviting chaos into the hospital.
How confident are you that your workflow couldn’t use an improvement? Call us for a consultation and demo.
Gartner’s Magic Quadrant for CC&C recognized OnPage for its practical, purpose-built solutions that streamline critical…
Site Reliability Engineer’s Guide to Black Friday It’s gotten to the point where Black Friday…
Cloud engineers have become a vital part of many organizations – orchestrating cloud services to…
Organizations across the globe are seeing rapid growth in the technologies they use every day.…
How Effective Are Your Alerting Rules? Recently, I came across this Reddit post highlighting the…
What Are Large Language Models? Large language models are algorithms designed to understand, generate, and…